學者動态

高祥教授的論文被美國、加拿大法院的判例援引

日期:2020-05-22 18:53    點擊數:    來源:

近悉,我院高祥教授于2003年發表在《聖疊戈國際法雜志》上的The Unique Jurisprudence of Letters of Credit: Its Origin and Sources一文被美國關島最高法院(Supreme Court)在Guam Top Builders, Inc. v. Tanota Partners, 2006 WL 586123 (2006)一案的判決中三次引用,于2002年發表在《賓夕法尼亞大學國際經濟法雜志》上的The Development of the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law: the Journey So Far and the Road Ahead一文被加拿大魁北克高等法院(Superior Court)在Alessandra Yarns, L.L.L. v. Tongxiang Baoding Textile Co. Ltd., 2015 QCCS 346一案的判決中兩次引用。

此前,高祥教授的英文專著The Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit: A Comparative Study曾被美國紐約最高法院(Supreme Court)在Fortis Bank (Nederland) N.V. v. Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank, 32 Misc.3d 1232(A);936 N.Y.S.2d 58;2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 6658;2010 NY Slip Op 52415(U)一案的判決中兩次引用。

據不完全統計,高祥教授的論著被國際同行數次引用,更有四篇英文論文被節選編入英美國際商法[1]、國際貿易法[2]和國際銀行法[3]教材,還有三篇被從英文翻譯成波斯文。[4]高祥教授的專著The Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit: A Comparative Study一經出版,便在國際上産生了重大影響,國際著名信用證法學家John F. Dolan教授專門為此撰寫書評,稱其為“a significant work …, a major contribution to letter of credit literature”。[5]



注釋:

[1] The Unique Jurisprudence of Letters of Credit: Its Origin and Sources, 4 San Diego Int'l L. J. 91 (2003)和Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit in the PRC, 41 Int'l Law. 1067 (2007)被節選編入由WEST Academic Publishing于2009年出版的美國國際商法教材International Business Transactions, A Problem Oriented Coursebook第10版。

[2] A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law, 13 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 293 (2003)被節選編入由牛津大學出版社于2009年11月出版的英國國際貿易法教材International Business Law。

[3] The Development of the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead, 23 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 663 (2002)和A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law, 13 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 293 (2003)被節選編入由West Academic Publishing于2015年9月出版的美國國際銀行法教材International Banking Law

[4] The Development of the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead, 23 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 663 (2002), A Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required Under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law, 13 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 293 (2003)和The Unique Jurisprudence of Letters of Credit: Its Origin and Sources, 4 San Diego Int'l L. J. 91 (2003)被譯為波斯文。

[5] John F. Dolan, The Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit — A Comparative Study Xiang Gao, 20 B.F.L.R., 281, 281 (2005).


Baidu
sogou